There’s some dissonance how ppl resent “coin creator has to dump to make money” with also imo the most interesting thing abt tokens being their volatility and potential for being “equity in an idea”. Like the incentive alignment from a dev/creator holding the token should be a feature not a bug.

Fee on volatility is cool but still does not feel like real incentive alignment, moreso a revenue stream

was this thought about tokens in general like made off clanker or more so zora?

or were you just being general

i think it kinda does apply to all of the above in a way still

/blank /screenshot // going /higher // blankspace.net

General but could apply to all of the above

Was thinking about how Flaunch fees are entirely in ETH to the creator and whether that’s necessarily a good thing

something like that, i could be (am likely) butchering it

yea it's an interesting mechanism where the creator accrues fees in both token and eth, but when there are fees in the token those get swapped out for eth first before the token in the LP, so creator essentially only ever accrues ETH fees but without any "extra" selling

ty

i see- flaunch automatically sells the native coin to eth (like from the LP rewards)?