six
@six
There’s some dissonance how ppl resent “coin creator has to dump to make money” with also imo the most interesting thing abt tokens being their volatility and potential for being “equity in an idea”. Like the incentive alignment from a dev/creator holding the token should be a feature not a bug. Fee on volatility is cool but still does not feel like real incentive alignment, moreso a revenue stream
7 replies
3 recasts
36 reactions
six
@six
The uncharitable interpretation would be that fee on volatility is actually a perverse incentive.
1 reply
2 recasts
15 reactions
𝙗𝙡𝙖𝙣𝙠
@blankspace
was this thought about tokens in general like made off clanker or more so zora? or were you just being general i think it kinda does apply to all of the above in a way still
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Toady Hawk
@toadyhawk.eth
Maybe launchpads could allow deployers to easily vest tokens on preset schedules and the UI could give coins a score based on the fairness of the schedule.
1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
links 🏴
@links
As long as the incentive structure is based on trading instead of holding, the people who are successful at launching tokens will be volatile. I’m not against trade incentives, I just think that they need to be used in concert with something else if you want long-game creators to use them.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Biggydaddy.eth
@biggydaddy
I’ve always seen token volatility as a feature, alignment, not exit liquidity.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
De Boy
@deboy
At the end we'll wanna make profit 🙄
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Frenzy
@tokenpocket
But if someone is getting free lunch What's the harm in taking it
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction