Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/cryptoleft
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

shazow pfp
shazow
@shazow.eth
People afraid of communism have trouble imagining a world where a "communally owned" consensus and governance system can exist in a way that is not reduced to a dictator. They're also people who argue that cryptocurrency is just a bad database with more steps.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

Tara Tiger Brown Ⓥ pfp
Tara Tiger Brown Ⓥ
@tarabrown
To be fair there aren’t a lot of good examples of where it’s turned out well.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

shazow pfp
shazow
@shazow.eth
Is your family not operating on a communal governance?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tara Tiger Brown Ⓥ pfp
Tara Tiger Brown Ⓥ
@tarabrown
I’m the boss
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

shazow pfp
shazow
@shazow.eth
Was there no boss in the examples you were thinking of?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tara Tiger Brown Ⓥ pfp
Tara Tiger Brown Ⓥ
@tarabrown
Perhaps I’m not on the same page as you. These are the definitions I am going by: communist governance is centralized and state controlled with one person in charge and community governance is decentralized, locally focused with multiple leaders.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

shazow pfp
shazow
@shazow.eth
Communism is unrelated to centrally planned economies or totalitarianism, it's a different axis. Communism is collective ownership over the means of production. Or I prefer to think about it as: Who gets the unbounded upside from an investment? In communism, all contributors share in the rewards of unbounded upside.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

shazow pfp
shazow
@shazow.eth
To contrast, in capitalism, the employee/employer relationship means the employer gets unbounded upside but the employee gets fixed compensation. In family context, imagine being wealthy with a mansion and 10 paid servants catering to you as employees. Now imagine they're family. How is the relationship different?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tara Tiger Brown Ⓥ pfp
Tara Tiger Brown Ⓥ
@tarabrown
I was thinking about Communist states and parties whereas it seems you are referring to communism as a stateless, self-administering society based on the Marxist theoretical constructs.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction