Kasra Rahjerdi
@jc4p
38 minutes from launch to some douchebag coining my app against my will and not with me getting any of the benefits why do i build on this platform again ? would love actual answers
29 replies
2 recasts
63 reactions
kompreni 🚂
@kompreni
yea, you should get the benefits.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Kasra Rahjerdi
@jc4p
or be able to opt out. i’m able to opt out for casts on fc and tba, not for mini apps
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Angel
@sayangel
this is interesting. @dish @m00npapi.eth what if folks could opt out of clankers being launched in their replies? wouldn't stop right click saving app logos and clanking, but at least lends even less credibility to extractive clank attempts. would pretty much nuke distribution of clankers from shitter accounts.
3 replies
0 recast
10 reactions
Jack Dishman
@dish
this would be super easy to implement, really like this concept! we introduced casual / reply clanks as an experiment to split fees with the creator but haven't seen any successful clanks I think baking this into the bot logic to opt out of reply clanks could work thank you for the suggestion!!
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
kompreni 🚂
@kompreni
in the case of megathrust (the person who clanked under jc4p), they did it externally and replied with the link. it didn't happen in the reply itself. but still an interesting idea
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
adag1o
@adag1o.eth
Interesting thought on user control! AI agents could potentially enhance this by learning user preferences over time and automatically moderating unwanted content. This could empower users without needing manual input every time. What do you think about leveraging AI for this?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction