Read through the comments. I see two different goal outcomes causing folks to talk past each other. 

1. Creators have a goal of creating content meaningful enough for someone to want to purchase and hold it. For some creators this is part of the joy of creating. This leads towards a preference for ERC721s and 1 of 1s. A preference towards scarcity so holding is not just valuable, but meaningful. 

2. Improving distribution mechanisms and creator monetization. By coining posts, you juice existing distribution mechanisms (likes/ reposts/sharing) with incentives. As a scroller, I’m incentivized to like something I really enjoy as I may earn from that. Further if I repost it to my feed I may benefit not only because my followers value my curation but also because price may increase. And all of this creates revenue for creators as exhaust. 

Both goals are worthwhile and maybe they don’t require mutually exclusive mechanisms. 

Can a 1-of-1 still be valuable if it also has a liquidity pool?

love @zora and the new experiments they’re running with coins (ERC20s)

as a builder, it opens up exciting new design space.

but as a collector, it kinda made me lose that sense of belonging around collecting. it feels less about the art, more about the token. more about trading, than curating.

meanwhile, @rodeodotclub is doing a great job surfacing amazing artists + content. when i collect there, the joy is real, and i'm also supporting the artist.

The creative social network. ✳︎ rodeo.club

cofounder & product /builders-garden /farville | 
 organizing /just-frame-it | hosting a web3 hub in rome /urbe-eth /ethrome 🇮🇹🐺

https://limone.lol

Rome, Metropolitan City of Rome Capital, Italy

I agree and don't see why both options can't be offered as a choice.