Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/earlymorningcrew
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Gramajo
@gramajo.eth
What makes a good (subjective) candidate for a revnet token? @jango.eth @kmacb.eth Only projects that are highly focused on revenue (companies trying to find PMF)? What about content creators who earn some revenue & already do rev sharing? What about a DAO that does some light revenue streams? Thinking of new use cases.
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
rubinovitz
@rubinovitz
It seems hard to incentivize high revenue projects to want to share with lower revenue projects so I’m curious about this too. It made sense to me with Flows because I think there is room for a more wholesome utility project token launcher under the Nouns brand and people would pay revenue to be under the Nouns brand.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Gramajo
@gramajo.eth
haha you read my mind, mostly was trying to apply to a couple scenarios in my head so I can understand it. Flows made sense if the revnet was for the whole thing because not every scenario is revenue generating but the collective could cover the non revenue generating work. For NounsGolf, we could do it for merch sales, rev share. Then I could use token for voting or split it for those that want to participate. But yeah, seems like if you already have a ton of revenue or ideas how to tackle that, why share? Maybe builder dao could have been a good revshare or a nouns ish service provider pivot idk
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
