Early Morning Crew

Ethereum builder & people connector. Juicebox, Revnet, Defifa & Footy App. My innie posts stuff on kmacb.eth.sucks

🧃⚡️🍌 ⏩ https://jango.eth.sucks

I like my money onchain, my web content peer-to-peer, my world in love. @juicebox @revnet @bannynet.eth

What makes a good (subjective) candidate for a revnet token? @jango.eth @kmacb.eth 

Only projects that are highly focused on revenue (companies trying to find PMF)? What about content creators who earn some revenue & already do rev sharing? What about a DAO that does some light revenue streams?

Thinking of new use cases.

Michelada connoisseur. Chief Onchain Officer at /area51 since 2022 AD. Focused on digital art & crypto

I owe you a DM on discord, just had a couple of P0s pop off since Monday 😢

Think you’re on the right track. If the progestins looking to decentralize ‘control’ of decision making revnet probably not the best fit. Try Juicebox.money for those. But yes if there are money flow & you want to reward customers / community with tokens that are a claim on the projects future revenue this is a good fit. 

Would be a GREAT for for the FC Pro subscriptions eg.

type poes

Hacker founder using ai to coordinate onchain economies /tenfold, nounish channel client /comint

More: rubinovitz.com

Tbh I would love a Nouns fork that is just a revnet of nounish businesses sharing a treasury

haha you read my mind, mostly was trying to apply to a couple scenarios in my head so I can understand it. Flows made sense if the revnet was for the whole thing because not every scenario is revenue generating but the collective could cover the non revenue generating work.

For NounsGolf, we could do it for merch sales, rev share. Then I could use token for voting or split it for those that want to participate.

But yeah, seems like if you already have a ton of revenue or ideas how to tackle that, why share? Maybe builder dao could have been a good revshare or a nouns ish service provider pivot idk

It seems hard to incentivize high revenue projects to want to share with lower revenue projects so I’m curious about this too.

It made sense to me with Flows because I think there is room for a more wholesome utility project token launcher under the Nouns brand and people would pay revenue to be under the Nouns brand.