Content
@
https://flows.wtf/draft/962
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
rocketman
@rocketman
@pandagrey Hey! Checked out your Nouns Art draft - love the vision of supporting artists and preventing great work from being lost. A few questions that might help strengthen the proposal: 1. How does this differentiate from existing platforms like uplink.wtf (which struggled to gain traction) and bountycaster (already doing bounties)? What unique value prop makes this succeed where others haven't? 2. The revenue model mentions minting fees and 20% commissions - do you have data on what transaction volumes you'd need to be sustainable? What's the path to those numbers? 3. Have you validated demand with artists/startups? Any early partnerships or commitments that show market pull? The art curation angle is interesting - maybe leaning more into that unique positioning vs general marketplace could help clarify the differentiation?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Pandagrey🔵🎩
@pandagrey
1. How does Nouns Art differentiate? Curation-first: Most platforms optimize for transaction flow (mint sales), bounty payouts but Nouns Art exists first to document and showcase the culture itself. The goal is to build a living visual archive: a resource that communities can dip into to create content, amplify project identity, and attract new members. Several successful projects maintain dedicated “art channels” that archive community-generated artwork. This has proven sustainable—artists and communities alike continue to engage as long as they want to “preach the project.” Nouns Art’s focus is to become a living gallery where art isn’t ephemeral social content, but an organized, discoverable collection. Simplicity & automation: Nouns Art is intentionally simple and frictionless. Artists don’t need to “list” or manually submit—just create and share. The platform automatically curates from Farcaster channels to keep content fresh and engaging.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
