Content
@
https://flows.wtf/flow/0x545d0175b980b5f68c7845bdbdb40ff5a0d2f4e369640d9a4f21681d80d4cc24/about
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Flo
@flowit
@rocketman just challenged the removal request of the Public artwork flow by @volky.eth . This flow was originally sponsored by @rocketman
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
GEM ⌐◨-◨
@gem6911
what's your reason for wanting to remove the 'Public Artwork' grant? @volky.eth
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Volky
@volky.eth
> This flow is a subcategory of Nouns Art. Having it as a standalone category gives it an unfair advantage in relation to Nouns Art because there's less competition, hence the flows are larger (3x larger on average. ref: https://flows.nouns.day). I suggest builders move their flows to Nouns Art and we'll redistribute to relocate this budget there. (you can check the challenge reasons on flows.wtf, btw)
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
rocketman
@rocketman
it's a different flow with different requirements and fixed costs that should be rewarded + verified differently imho. the fact that it's a standalone category doesn't mean there's inherently less competition. the min salary is higher, so there's actually more incentive for folks to apply vs. nouns art.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Volky
@volky.eth
I’m not convinced that explains the difference. art flow has a $75 floor, public art is $100 not a huge gap. even with the 3x higher incentive (3x bigger flows) there are still not a lot of flows in that category (1/5th of art flow), so it’s a fact that there’s significantly less competition.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
