tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
My 2c on Airdrop-Selling drama: + I worked with Merkle on an Airdrop. They didn't impose their criteria on us, they helped us to set *our* critieria. + Therefore, I think many people are mistakingly taking Dan's comment as a threat "from Dan" when, in fact, it is his observation of what Airdrop Teams will decide for their self-interest. + And I'd say Dan's point is directionally correct – giving airdrops that seem likely to be insta-sold is less appealing to Teams than the opposite. + However, selling does *not* have to overwhelm all other criteria. Eg, if someone is a power-user of many apps and tokens like @tricil.eth, this may be more important to a Team than whether he sold a drop or not. tldr: Dan's point clearly has merit, but Airdrop Criteria is a unique decision made by each Team (not by Merkle!)
30 replies
40 recasts
240 reactions
Reeeny
@reeeny
I also saw it as a positive that possible criteria is discussed and can therefore be taken into consideration by people getting airdrops. People constantly complain that they don't get enough airdrops or less than others and now they know that their actions have consequences. That change of perspective is really hard for some and this discussion might help people multiply the view as well.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction