Purpπ΅πΈ
@purp
OK banger
7 replies
0 recast
32 reactions
downshift πΉβ³π
@downshift.eth
lmao SpaceX is *SO* much more capital efficient than Boeing or ULA or any of that other bullshit, this is totally fkn stupid
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
ππππ
@degencummunist.eth
Let them eat, EACH OTHER!
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
downshift πΉβ³π
@downshift.eth
SpaceX is a gift, Elon is not (anymore, at least)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Purpπ΅πΈ
@purp
SpaceX is another example at innovation on the backs of public funds/government publically paid contracts, while SpaceX privatizes profit and services, lol we shouldn't be paying for the private gains with no material returns to the working class
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
downshift πΉβ³π
@downshift.eth
no. do some research. read Liftoff by Eric Berger and stop regurgitating leftist horseshit π© also look at how much MORE (WAY WAY MORE) money went into ULA and other wasteful contractors
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
downshift πΉβ³π
@downshift.eth
(Elon nearly went bankrupt in the process; he put his balls and over $100M of his own money on the table because NASA would NOT BACK HIM)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Purpπ΅πΈ
@purp
Since 2008 hes gotten over 15 billion dollars in subsidies from government( the majority coming from nasa) and he even himself admits that nasa contracts saved the company. I'd have the same complaint against any private company that does this, lol but not sure how its leftist horseshit https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.ndtv.com/offbeat/elon-musk-says-nasas-1-5-billion-contract-had-saved-spacex-from-going-broke-2502210
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
downshift πΉβ³π
@downshift.eth
SpaceX delivers payload to orbit at BY FAR the lowest cost per point ever. who do you suggest the government hire instead? Boeing? Lockheed? ULA? be serious
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
