Daniel Marans
@dmarans
On X, people were arguing to me that this is OK, because people charged with crimes are often detained before trial. But there's no known crime here, and the terms and circumstances of his arrest are opaque and arbitrary, including the transfer to Louisiana. He wasn't in touch with his lawyer until recently. The argument seems to be that the government can unilaterally revoke a green card based on an affiliation with a foreign terrorist organization, but the proof of that -- beyond a subjective ideological designation -- is flimsy at best.
4 replies
2 recasts
15 reactions
Purp🇵🇸
@purp
Yeah I'm not sure where anyone can look at this and be like o yeah this is solid this is a positive and good thing
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Daniel Marans
@dmarans
The fact that there might be a plausible legal argument for it -- and of course, I doubt that -- would only make it scarier.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions