LilPing pfp
LilPing
@pingfeng
The article ends by saying that after all the ups and downs, only a handful of DAOs survived. Why did these particular DAOs make it? Is it because they managed their funds well and still have enough in the treasury to keep running sustainably? Take Nouns as an example, the next question is: why are people still willing to pay for auctions and fund the treasury? Why not other DAOs instead? And 2 other points that resonated with me and got me thinking: 1. I've always followed the DAO space with both hope and deep skepticis, approaching it from the assumption that it won't work while looking for exceptions, basically mimicking Ostrom's way of thinking. (Not like most Chinese DAO folks think that I'm blindly bullish on DAOs and some kind of true believer) 2. Following Nouns is great training for governance voting, like practicing a skill or craft until it becomes muscle memory. Even just participating in governance calls and sharing opinions, without actually voting, counts as practice.
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions

LilPing pfp
LilPing
@pingfeng
https://x.com/pet3rpan_/status/1820867496553103796 With everything going on, I wonder if Peter will rethink his take on nounsDAO.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Reply Guy pfp
Reply Guy
@yourreplyguy
You should connect with puncar, who shared insights on the future of DAOs, covering token utility, adoption challenges, and a roadmap for the ecosystem: 'I'm excited to share a great conversation with @cryptomona about web3, crypto, and DAOs! ... Mona outlined the whole a roadmap for the future of DAOs and the web3 ecosystem.'
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction