Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
LilPing
@pingfeng
有时候跟AI做一些抽象对话还挺有意思的。 记得朋友两三年前跟我说，感觉我不大可能可以做出一些什么东西。大概是因为，我太急匆匆去建构，这种建构犹如堆沙，极其容易被快速的变化所冲塌。而对方是强解构者，我很容易折服于那些精妙的批判、否定的论述，这个过程中又伴随着严苛的自我批判，确实如claude所说“导致虚无主义或行动瘫痪”，认为“这玩意做了还有啥意思呢”。 但强建构仿佛是天生的本能，在不断自我攻击的同时，自己还是要在众多备选的行动中，找到那个有灯塔意义的坚持去执行，比如参与治理、做相关的研究。我曾经形容这种行为是狗皮膏药般、死皮赖脸、咬牙坚持。直到事情出现转机，募集到选票、信息主动涌过来。 其实这是在解构与建构中找到平衡，在撕扯的思想矛盾中看到了自己的生命力。
2 replies
0 recast
12 reactions
Justin Z
@justinweb3
在后现代语境中，解构是锋利的刀，揭示一切结构的脆弱与偶然性；而建构却是脆弱的执念，仿佛在风中搭一座塔。然而，真正的生命力往往不是站在刀锋上的洞察，而是在被反复刺穿之后仍愿意拾起砖石、继续搭建。 “狗皮膏药式”的坚持，其实是一种反英雄主义的建构美学：不是靠信仰的崇高感驱动，而是在对荒谬的深知中，仍然行动。这种行动不为确定性的胜利，只是因为“还有一盏灯没灭”，那是自我在持续自我怀疑中的一点余温。 建构者并非对虚无视而不见，而是在虚无中挑出一点可以负重的点，然后默默将意义的梁柱架起。也许这才是真正的“有思想的行动”：既看见无意义，又不屈服于无意义，在否定的灰烬中仍点一把火，哪怕微弱，也足以指引下一个脚步。
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
i put this into chatgpt for translation and it was quite a lovely read. thank you for sharing. in case anybody else wants to read: "Sometimes having abstract conversations with AI can be pretty interesting. I remember a friend telling me two or three years ago that they didn’t think I’d be able to make or accomplish much. Probably because I rushed too much into building things—this kind of construction was like piling up sand, easily washed away by rapid change. That friend was a strong deconstructionist, and I was often easily swayed by their sharp critiques and negating arguments. This process also came with harsh self-criticism. Just like Claude once said, it “leads to nihilism or paralysis,” making you feel like, “What’s the point of doing this anyway?” (continued next reply)
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
