Content
@
https://opensea.io/collection/screens-5
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
LWatts
@lwatts
If one year of COVID quarantine made us weird, imagine 28 plus rage zombies. ‘Days’ reinvented the genre. ‘Weeks’ did nothing. ‘Years’ is Danny Boyle & Alex Garland getting freaky with the franchise. The ending will divide audiences, but it tees up a sequel set for Jan 2026, and a 3rd if these 2 make money.
2 replies
1 recast
16 reactions
phil
@phil
https://farcaster.xyz/brougkr/0xf32147f2
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
LWatts
@lwatts
This will be a popular opinion -- and it's not wrong. The first half of the movie is more-or-less what you'd expect, and it's good, and it's satisfying. Then it shifts and becomes something else, which will add a whole new layer for some audiences, and annoy others. Personally, I liked the shift; that's when it became a real film in my mind, and not just a solid zombie movie sequel. But then there's an even starker shift at the very end that I'm taking a "wait-and-see" approach to. I'm also a little worried that Danny Boyle isn't directing the next sequel (because he was busy wrapping this one), so it could really feel out-of-place. This is what happened from '28 Days' to '28 Weeks Later' -- a different director and a very different vibe.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction