Colin Johnson 💭
@cojo.eth
Curious about this one - we use Granola internally and always declare it externally. https://farcaster.xyz/ted/0x52efc566
4 replies
4 recasts
23 reactions
Steve Pederzani
@ozmium.eth
I’m biased on my answer because as an attorney I know this is literally illegal still in many states not just an ethical thing. Single vs Party consent is very much an alive and well-litigated thing! 😂
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Colin Johnson 💭
@cojo.eth
Interesting! So Granola’s product is almost certainly enabling tons of illegal activity every day?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Steve Pederzani
@ozmium.eth
All of them, as old as those “do you want to record this Teams/Zoom?” bars happened! But, there’s safeharbors. You’ll notice for recordings from WA state, often times they have an annoying banner that re-pops up every X minutes, often some “hang up recording starting” pre recording and rejoin disclaimer message, etc. But out in places like Nebraska, you can walk outside with a mic on you and use it in most scenarios because single-party recording states basically mean “you are the consenting party if you’re in the audio,” versus WA which is a “everyone requires notice and a pre-recording chance to exit” state. All my privacy law class snippets from 2016 are finally seeing light of day. 😂
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Colin Johnson 💭
@cojo.eth
Had to look up Georgia where I’m at, single party consent here :)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Steve Pederzani
@ozmium.eth
What’s cool is online, State+State with the most restrictive one takes precedence generally— so if we Zoomed you could stealth record me since Nebraska and Georgia are both single(self) consent states so long as you’re in the recording too. Some people forget that! (ie, I can’t use my drone to go snoop on someone’s conversation unless the drone is simultaneously recording me.) There’s such a deep dive on privacy laws, but those State protections were always the controlling result in every case we talked about in class like it!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Steve Pederzani
@ozmium.eth
*unless I am party to the conversation being recorded. Better phrasing. (Eg, if I somehow fly a drone to Georgia to record the audio of cojo talking to me in safe. Now the FAA and other rules there might have a word about the means… but the recorded audio itself would be clear on a privacy level typically there lol.)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
