Base

OP Stack

Retro Funding Round 4 application is opening soon. 🔴 v 🔴 

Hear Michael's story about how educating the world about the Superchain and the Optimism Collective qualified him for pass rounds.

If you are building/telling stories/educating/vibing on the Superchain (and yes, @base is a proud member of the Superchain), you're qualified for Retro Fundings. 

Round 4 coming in May. Stay tuned. 🔵 o 🔵

You still need to hit the minimum contract interactions though, right? Any update on qualifications for builders on Farcaster?

O P T I M I S M 🔴✨

I'm a huge fan of Optimism retro funding and have voted as a badgeholder
 
Based on current categories and criteria, doesn't look like Bountycaster will qualify for submitting to any rounds (4,5,6, or 7)

Was hoping we'd qualify if building on top of Farcaster. Any chance there will be a broader category opportunity?

+1, had the same question. I think someone at @optimism looking into it again (as of this morning)

Crypto payments for small businesses. Contributing to the mainstream use of crypto. @gogh
ongogh.com /shop-la

+1, had the same question. I think someone at @optimism looking into it again (as of this morning)

https://warpcast.com/linda/0x36538cda

Developer ecosystem @farcaster, co-founder @bountycaster. Previously: co-founder of Scalar Capital, product at Coinbase, co-producer @ethereumfilm

Investigating with the team, and they'll reach out via DM directly 🤗

The intention is not to be exclusionary based on technicalities, rather this approach allow us to measure actual onchain interactions, and power voting via metrics, instead of manually reviewing projects!

We're exploring how future rounds could support consumer/dev tooling that is being build on Farcaster!

Quick follow up @linda & @manuelmaccou.eth
The onchain builder round is limited in scope to onchain contracts, because of this Farcaster builders without onchain contracts are not eligible for this round.

🔴✨ Trusted by developers, rebels, and Fortune 500's. Scaling Ethereum & its values.

awesome! Quick question: Our contracts have multiple thousands of transactions, most of them initiated by real users through frame interactions, but published by a single signer for simplicity. Would we still be eligible if we don't hit the "420 unique addresses" requirement? Happy to explain the whole system further!

Thanks for looking into it! We have a similar question: Our contracts have a large number transactions, but most of them routed through a single signer. They are all initiated by real users tho. Would be nice to get some clarity there :)

gm. Fulltime degen, building fun stuff onchain. 
Master of Disaster Frogworks, /ottodao bullfrog, ex @astaria

gmgm thanks for looking into it! Don't have any docs but happy to write down something or explain it over a call!

GM Hoot! Any docs you could share on this?

Thanks for looking into it! We have a similar question: Our contracts have a large number transactions, but most of them routed through a single signer. They are all initiated by real users tho. Would be nice to get some clarity there :) https://warpcast.com/owl/0xc25e6fc8