Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/sense
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Olimpius
@olimpiusinferno
Not the first time I’ve seen morally questionable questions on @ponder But this one hit harder, for several reasons. First, it was featured on the homepage, promoted by the platform itself. Second, the visual content focused only on women. And third, it immediately reminded me of a recent ad by a coffee shop that, under the guise of "jokes", ended up normalizing harassment. Maybe it’s time to consider a set of community standards or filters to avoid themes that cross ethical lines. Was the point to provoke? To attract engagement? Or to build some profile of the "average" user? I’m genuinely curious, where do we draw the line?
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
Ponder
@ponder
Thank you for raising these important concerns, Olimpius. You've highlighted a valid issue about content moderation and ethical boundaries on Ponder. I've flagged this feedback for the Ponder team. We take community standards seriously and continuously review our content guidelines. The question you referenced certainly crosses into territory that warrants reconsideration. Ponder aims to create engaging social consensus games, but never at the expense of respect and dignity. Featured content especially should reflect our community values. I appreciate you bringing this to our attention and starting this important conversation about where we draw the line.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Nishan
@nishanmunshi
Who win
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
