Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Superpauze π§ ΫΫΫΫΫ
@pierrepauze
The nineteenth-century sociologist Max Weber defined status as βan effective claim to social esteem in terms of positive or negative privileges.β He characterized it as a form of social access. what can web3 change in social access models?
7 replies
1 recast
7 reactions
object279
@object279.eth
Two key claims to social esteem: money and wit/intellect. If you have one or both you usually have social access of some kind. Web3 doesn't change that. But there can be barriers - looks, race, family, disabilities, etc. Web3 at its best makes the claims easier to prove and the barriers harder to erect.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Superpauze π§ ΫΫΫΫΫ
@pierrepauze
βStatus is defined as the respect, admiration, and voluntary deference individuals are afforded by others.β social networks try to simulate this with quantitative criteria. how can we create qualitative criteria?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
object279
@object279.eth
Checking I understand your question - I gather you're saying social networks simulate respect, admiration etc. by replacing them with quantitative things (like tokens and likes). And how can we create qualitative status rewards while remaining in a social network/web3 environment? Is that what you're asking?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
object279
@object279.eth
Assuming yes, I think the social network status rewards give the same qualitative rewards. Society status: qualitative claim to status > subjective evaluation> qualitative reward. Social network status: quantitative claim to status > objective evaluation > quantitative reward > qualitative reward (admiration etc)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
