Every mini app should have a token. But one that is actually connected to the underlying revenue model, not just a memecoin (to share revenue with users). It's the easiest way to get distribution and get users who become cheerleaders for you.

building @dau and @boostxyz to help app devs grow onchain with token incentives

bankr / clanker don’t have a flywheel (or) rev share with users and they’re the biggest fc eco coins in the recent past 

what you’re saying is generally sound advice though. but moonshots don’t have obvious (or necessary?) integrations with revenue / flywheel of the product (just yet) 

have given this a good long thought. realised anything forced with 1-2K revenue weekly has no merit 

figure how to do $100k/mo in rev first. then get into flywheel (what i think so far, will course correct)

revenue share isn't supposed to make people buy tokens, it's supposed to make people drive revenue.

Is there a historical example where rev share with users incentivized the users to drive revenue?

What does it mean for users to drive revenue? Are they marketing the product to  their distribution to bring in new users like affiliate marketing?

In the case of @tipn since everyone earns $tipn when they tip folks in usdc, we're seeing ATHs daily in terms of tippers tipping more to earn more $tipn as the mkt price of $tipn has been increasing which has also resulted in new ATHs for $tipn stakers (we're at nearly 40% total token supply staked) 
 
Speculation is fueling app usage, and app usage is fueling token action

if you consider now historical there's this

Building /neynar 🪐

We’re hiring staff software engineers, check out neynar.com/careers

if you consider now historical there's this

https://farcaster.xyz/niftytime.eth/0x0688cb41