Brian Flynn
@flynn.eth
Every mini app should have a token. But one that is actually connected to the underlying revenue model, not just a memecoin (to share revenue with users). It's the easiest way to get distribution and get users who become cheerleaders for you.
7 replies
9 recasts
52 reactions
tk
@tike
bankr / clanker don’t have a flywheel (or) rev share with users and they’re the biggest fc eco coins in the recent past what you’re saying is generally sound advice though. but moonshots don’t have obvious (or necessary?) integrations with revenue / flywheel of the product (just yet) have given this a good long thought. realised anything forced with 1-2K revenue weekly has no merit figure how to do $100k/mo in rev first. then get into flywheel (what i think so far, will course correct)
2 replies
1 recast
11 reactions
Brian Flynn
@flynn.eth
revenue share isn't supposed to make people buy tokens, it's supposed to make people drive revenue.
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
Manan
@manan
Is there a historical example where rev share with users incentivized the users to drive revenue? What does it mean for users to drive revenue? Are they marketing the product to their distribution to bring in new users like affiliate marketing?
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
niftytime
@niftytime.eth
In the case of @tipn since everyone earns $tipn when they tip folks in usdc, we're seeing ATHs daily in terms of tippers tipping more to earn more $tipn as the mkt price of $tipn has been increasing which has also resulted in new ATHs for $tipn stakers (we're at nearly 40% total token supply staked) Speculation is fueling app usage, and app usage is fueling token action
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
