I often wonder about the actual context of discussions around "the algorithm". Do I want an algorithm that is better at...

A. showing me the best content?
B. getting me the widest distribution?

It's such a difficult discussion to have in public, because 

1. No one in the 1% that creates content is ready to accept these two directions may be conflicting, ie. that my content is not that great.

2. The typical 90% that is mostly reading/liking is obviously in favor of A, but they are (by definition) not vocal.

3. Even between the 1-10% of users who post content, some are interested in writing (they want to share, and usually they only care about a few, specific, users reading them, their circle) and those who are interested in getting read (they will create based on what gets them attention).

Good luck to anyone trying to reconcile all these in a public discourse.

When you're casting: give me the widest distribution!

When you're scrolling: show me only the stuff I want to see

I would just tend towards the latter. 

Not seeing gym girls at the top of my feed every time i open the app supersedes my desire for distribution. 

There’s enough engagement bait slop on other platforms. [many of us] are here to escape that type of content.

Distribution ideally doesn’t come at the cost of quality content (subjective). I’m not interested in gym girl slop. Thankfully the mute button exists. 

I’d rather stay in cozy corners, personally. 

I recognize this does not suit a VC-backed platform strategy though. 

New clients may solve this in time.

No distribution, no new users, no growth. :)