keccers
@keccers.eth
Good grief. Some guy, who self describes as “Verified tech innovator who developed GiveCon, pioneering the $3B K-POP fandom app market. 32.6K YouTube subscribers. Not a random complainer but a serious user trying to use AI for creative collaboration.” Just blindly followed Claude’s instructions and is now whining on Hacker News about it all The companies do not see themselves as liable for false instructions and I thought this was abundantly clear? Hallucination risk has never not been a risk, it doesn’t matter how much you’re paying for the model? It’s on you to do your own due diligence? Embarrassing honestly https://gist.github.com/habonggil/f6130a68bbc4139c8066aa90c14c986f
9 replies
1 recast
20 reactions
keccers
@keccers.eth
Imagine trusting a tech company could never be me We are post trust and post morality And people are just out here blindly doing what AI is telling them to do!???
1 reply
0 recast
11 reactions
nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
you are so negative. is the hammer company liable if you drop the hammer on your toe? no. this is silliness.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
keccers
@keccers.eth
Yes a fully user controlled and transparent tool is totally 1:1 to a probabilistic and partially autonomous tool controlled by black box logic 🙄 There *should* be some responsibility on the manufacturer of ai to the maker to warn/monitor but they only care about making you a good slave — this is a happy outcome for them, that the user is so beholden to the system they turned their own brain off
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
