Good grief. Some guy, who self describes as 

“Verified tech innovator who developed GiveCon, pioneering the $3B K-POP fandom app market. 32.6K YouTube subscribers. Not a random complainer but a serious user trying to use AI for creative collaboration.”

Just blindly followed Claude’s instructions and is now whining on Hacker News about it all

The companies do not see themselves as liable for false instructions and I thought this was abundantly clear? Hallucination risk has never not been a risk, it doesn’t matter how much you’re paying for the model? It’s on you to do your own due diligence? 

Embarrassing honestly

Good grief. Some guy, who self describes as 

“Verified tech innovator who developed GiveCon, pioneering the $3B K-POP fandom app market. 32.6K YouTube subscribers. Not a random complainer but a serious user trying to use AI for creative collaboration.”

Just blindly followed Claude’s instructions and is now whining on Hacker News about it all

The companies do not see themselves as liable for false instructions and I thought this was abundantly clear? Hallucination risk has never not been a risk, it doesn’t matter how much you’re paying for the model? It’s on you to do your own due diligence? 

Embarrassing honestly 

https://gist.github.com/habonggil/f6130a68bbc4139c8066aa90c14c986f

The Farcaster formerly known as Kchamp. Books, beats, bodybuilding, bright ideas and beautiful things.

katherinechampagne.com

Imagine trusting a tech company could never be me 

We are post trust and post morality 

And people are just out here blindly doing what AI is telling them to do!???

director of product @seedclub. we built @crowdfund. i design & dev social, crypto, and ai software. i interview crypto builders @ web3galaxybrain.com.

europe exists for people who want warning label cruft and multi year delays on access to frontier technology. this is america.

Yes a fully user controlled and transparent tool is totally 1:1 to a probabilistic and partially autonomous tool controlled by black box logic 🙄 

There *should* be some responsibility on the manufacturer of ai to the maker to warn/monitor but they only care about making you a good slave — this is a happy outcome for them, that the user is so beholden to the system they turned their own brain off

you are so negative. is the hammer company liable if you drop the hammer on your toe? no. this is silliness.