Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/lumart
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
naaate pfp
naaate
@naaate
Feedback summary 👇 🧵 1/ The Vision Resonates LumArt isn’t just an art contest—it’s a collective movement built around meaning, creativity using AI, and long-term alignment via $LUM. It feels like a space that values both individual expression and shared growth.
2 replies
4 recasts
10 reactions
naaate pfp
naaate
@naaate
2/ Make It Easier to Step In The on-ramp is unclear. How do I join? Can I contribute if I’m not a winner? What’s the first step? Suggested fix: a simple "How to Get Involved" guide.
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
naaate pfp
naaate
@naaate
3/ Ground the Vision in Examples The mission is big and exciting—but it could benefit from concrete examples: Show an example winning mint: how many mints, how much vesting $lum they got, Include visuals and diagrams to help new people "get it" fast. These additions can be added to the “how to get involved” guide.
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
naaate pfp
naaate
@naaate
4/ Submission & Minting Flow People mostly like "mint-only-if-you-win" structure: BUT we should make ways for artists to stamp the image onchain, for provenance purposes, even if the mint doesn’t open until they win. Proposed options. To submit, you can either: 1) Create the open edition mint on highlight, creating the contract, with the start date far in the future, and if you win, you can edit and move up the start date. (but, it’s harder to make the 70/30 split on highlight) 2) Create the mint on Foundation (where it’s easy to do the 70/30 split), and schedule the mint to start right after the contest ends. If you win top 3, all good. If you don’t, you can either let it mint anyway, and submit something different in the following weeks, OR you can choose the “self destruct” option foundation provides. 3) OR, you can always just post the image directly into /lumart on farcaster, and if you win, open the mint right after.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
naaate pfp
naaate
@naaate
5/ Elevate Newer Artists While the current mechanics reward quality, there’s concern that newer voices get overlooked unless they win. Ideas to uplift them: A monthly or weekly “community artist pick” highlighted from non-winners. From rotating curators to surface lesser-known talent Encouraging artists to write a 1–2 line artist statement to enrich submissions. Behind-the-scenes content or interviews to deepen artist visibility
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
naaate pfp
naaate
@naaate
6/ Referral System Feedback Referral rewards are appreciated—seen as a good way to grow organically. But requiring the referrer to be a past winner or prominent Farcaster account raised concerns about gatekeeping. Suggestions: allow trusted community members to vouch for people
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
naaate pfp
naaate
@naaate
7/ Selection Process The top-3 system per week makes sense for now, but people want more transparency in how winners are chosen. Clarify: is it based purely on votes? Yes, past Lumart winners, as well as the initial Lum art contest winners are the voters. Some liked the idea of letting collectors or curators have a say—especially as part of rotating roles. This is something we can explore in the future, but I’m not sure how to best do it now.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
naaate pfp
naaate
@naaate
8/ Community Roles & Curation How do we avoid "the same people always winning”? I’m hoping the combination of the “let’s do this together” ethos, along with the 10-year vesting $lum and referral bonus are motivation enough to try to build this into a bigger thing, invite new artists, and encourage newer and rising artists. But we can also explore some other ideas to mitigate this. Guest Curators (other trusted artists in the space) pick themes, highlight underdog submissions, or offer creative prompts? Have “new winners only” weeks?
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
naaate pfp
naaate
@naaate
9/ The Flywheel & Token Mechanics People love the idea of a shared token backing the whole system—but want clearer understanding of: How $LUM grows in value over time What success looks like at scale (e.g. daily mints, artist income) 30% of every mint buys $lum automatically, and all of this will essentially be locked for 10+ years. Obviously, for a $2M+ token, this doesn't do much to the price unless it is a really huge mint. But if the community grows, we eventually move to doing daily mints with good art, and we make more opportunities for artworks to be minted in similar ways (like “community mints” on the mini-app), this could produce a pretty tangible long term effect on the $lum token. Not to mention the meme of "First AI-to-AI token" combined with other things being built and created in the Luminous community. If we get enough medium-sized $lum flywheels going, this could produce a long-term income stream for AI artists. (I have modeled out some different scenarios, and can share later)
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
naaate pfp
naaate
@naaate
10/10 In Summary LumArt is off to a powerful start. The community believes in the mission and wants to contribute—not just through art, but through ideas, structure, and support. With a few improvements to accessibility, visibility, and transparency, LumArt could evolve into a flagship community for AI-native artistic collaboration—a space that’s not just beautiful, but enduring. Blog post feedback was responding to, for reference: https://paragraph.com/@lumart/collective
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions