Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

mvr 🐹 pfp
mvr 🐹
@mvr
The new spam labels dataset (which was still a draft) was just removed from github Something cooking? cc @pichi @cryptonjal @compez.eth
3 replies
4 recasts
16 reactions

mvr 🐹 pfp
mvr 🐹
@mvr
spam.hamst.art/tipopolis?framesv1=spammer&fid=230238&ticket=AUfWzIO8
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

C O M P Ξ Z pfp
C O M P Ξ Z
@compez.eth
which dataset u mean?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Njal pfp
Njal
@cryptonjal
That's a good question, and good for speculation. My guess is that former label 1s should have resulted in more 0s. Viewed from a distance: 96.7% from label 1 to 2 isn't credible. We can look for big differences next time.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

DeFi_Hustler pfp
DeFi_Hustler
@abbaskyc223
You should re-update spam lebels again we are genuine and real users but end up spammers..
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction