DeFi

okay more seriously,

burning 10% supply is good

bringing all their employees to focus on value accrual is good

the legal setup here is very cool

https://gov.uniswap.org/t/unification-proposal/25881

"Many community members wish the fee switch had been turned on earlier as UNI holders have missed out on years of fees on ~$4 trillion in Uniswap protocol volume. Alas, we cannot turn back the clock… or can we?

We propose a retroactive burn of 100 million UNI from the treasury. This is an estimate of what
might have been burned if the protocol fee switch had been active at token launch."

Ok, now Adams has my attention.

you probably don’t think about liquidity enough // it is what it is  // build value, not valuation

Oh, and if you buy UNI now you're basically getting front-ran by what looks like insider trading to me.

https://farcaster.xyz/six/0x81303d4a

@aerodrome is undervalued.

Uniswap tokens capture fees in buy-back-and-burn whenever the devs decide. Meanwhile Aerodrome has all fees they earn going directly to tokenholders, and it's enshrined forever, so an AERO is representative of all future cashflows in the protocol.

Aero is around $1B but is doing around $200M a year in fee revenue without any weird governance rules and is wysiwyg. Uni's at $5B doing $2B in revenue but governance could always make fee adjustments and it has ran for 5 years now on the "promise" to return value to tokenholders rather than actually doing it.

Also, Aero is Base's liquidity hub and heavily partners with Coinbase in distribution, meanwhile I'm not even sure if anyone uses Unichain and doesn't have partnerships with CEX/cryptobanks at all.

nfa dyor.

here's a fun one, they burned 10% of the token at $4T volume

the nyse does ~$6.9T annual

what mean?