Miles Jennings pfp

Miles Jennings

@milesjennings

147 Following
1376 Followers


Miles Jennings pfp
1 reply
5 recasts
40 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
3 replies
3 recasts
23 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
5 replies
8 recasts
39 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
0 reply
1 recast
8 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
3 replies
9 recasts
86 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
2 replies
4 recasts
22 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
1 reply
3 recasts
36 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
0 reply
0 recast
11 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
4 replies
2 recasts
18 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
5 replies
19 recasts
67 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
3 replies
7 recasts
20 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
2 replies
8 recasts
37 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
1 reply
4 recasts
17 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
2 replies
5 recasts
20 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
4 replies
13 recasts
67 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
The critical takeaway here isn't about memecoins. It's that the SEC's interpretation of Howey continues to be that an investment contract may exist based on the "economic reality" of an arrangement. The SEC's recent optimistic approach to the industry and the dismissal of many of its cases has led a lot of people to believe that "everything is legal". That's particularly true because most of the cases the SEC has been dropping/settling involved arguments by the defendants that, rather than "economic reality," Howey's investment contract analysis hinged on whether there was a formal contract. So, if the dismissals were a sign that the SEC was accepting of this "predicate contract" argument (and abandoning the "economic reality" argument), nearly every token in existence would be legal. This release confirms the SEC doesn't believe "everything is legal" and that's a good thing.
9 replies
18 recasts
86 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
0 reply
3 recasts
22 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
0 reply
5 recasts
58 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
5 replies
16 recasts
69 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
5 replies
24 recasts
141 reactions