Miles Jennings pfp

Miles Jennings

@milesjennings

147 Following
1373 Followers


Miles Jennings pfp
1 reply
5 recasts
38 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
1 reply
7 recasts
29 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
3 replies
3 recasts
26 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
5 replies
8 recasts
37 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
0 reply
1 recast
8 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
3 replies
7 recasts
76 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
2 replies
4 recasts
22 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
1 reply
3 recasts
29 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
0 reply
0 recast
10 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
4 replies
2 recasts
18 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
5 replies
16 recasts
68 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
3 replies
7 recasts
18 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
2 replies
9 recasts
35 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
1 reply
4 recasts
14 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
2 replies
5 recasts
20 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
5 replies
10 recasts
49 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
The critical takeaway here isn't about memecoins. It's that the SEC's interpretation of Howey continues to be that an investment contract may exist based on the "economic reality" of an arrangement. The SEC's recent optimistic approach to the industry and the dismissal of many of its cases has led a lot of people to believe that "everything is legal". That's particularly true because most of the cases the SEC has been dropping/settling involved arguments by the defendants that, rather than "economic reality," Howey's investment contract analysis hinged on whether there was a formal contract. So, if the dismissals were a sign that the SEC was accepting of this "predicate contract" argument (and abandoning the "economic reality" argument), nearly every token in existence would be legal. This release confirms the SEC doesn't believe "everything is legal" and that's a good thing.
9 replies
18 recasts
80 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
0 reply
3 recasts
21 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
0 reply
5 recasts
46 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
5 replies
16 recasts
68 reactions