0xen 🎩
@0xen
With all their ideas, billions, power and influence, the thing that stings the most for the SF plutocrats is that at the end of the day they couldn't beat a few hundred acid damaged hippies for control or win hearts and minds of a singe city. They failed. An astonishing and embarrassing defeat. They can't lead so they seethe, sow division, deflect, and finally dream up fantastical escape hatches, someplace new and safe where they can be free from all bogies, someplace they can escape their own failure. This time will be different, right?
9 replies
0 recast
14 reactions
Matthew
@matthew
the idea that techies lost sf to “a few hundred acid damaged hippies” is so wildly incorrect. nice story tho bro
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
0xen 🎩
@0xen
Nimby organizers, city council dinner party power brokers, acid damaged hippies etc. Point is, with all their power and supposed smarts they could not outmaneuver or outflank this not very impressive sounding lot.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
✳️ dcposch
@dcposch.eth
not an SF problem, it's a "every big city on the west coast" problem. and it's not a few hundred hippies, it's an entrenched coalition of land-owning boomers and grandfathered-in below-market renters that together form an electoral majority.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0xen 🎩
@0xen
Average wage in the bay is 100k, there are over 300k millionaires, almost all of that coming from tech. Read that again. If tech can't create a coalition or move the needle with that rich and aligned of a base then hope is a lost and is a major indictment on their ability to govern anything.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Matthew
@matthew
1. san francisco is not the bay 2. tech is less than a third of sf by # of ppl. 3. a significant number of city workers in SF make over $200k. 4. tech doesn't govern the city. 5. the overall sentiment toward tech is not even negative
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0xen 🎩
@0xen
1. if you just count SF its 165k millionaires, if you include the metro it's over 500k. 2. 1/3rd is an astonishingly high number for a single sector in a city. 3. good for them, why can't the plutocrats win their hearts and minds? 4. that they have no influence will all their wealth and power makes them culpable 5. then why can't they create a coalition to move the needle? only answer is incompetence or that they just didn't care until recently.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Matthew
@matthew
there are not 165k tech millionaires in sf lol, and it's not 1/3, it's less. The fact that the small minority of people who happen to work in the same industry in a very diverse city do not drop everything, organize into a movement, and solve all the city's problems is not an indictment or culpability.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0xen 🎩
@0xen
you're right, it's actually more millionaires! 276k. 30%, 25%, even 10% is huge as far as city sectors go. All I'm hearing are excuses.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
