Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
mark mollé
@marmo.eth
✅ The Solution to Bots and Spam? Walk-and-talk videos @walkntalk coupled with a versioned up—2x better—Turing Test: 🧪 The Four Ring Test: 1. 🟤 Earth — Seeing & Doing → Are they grounded in the real world? What are you seeing and doing? 2. 🌬️ Air — Hearing & Saying → What are you hearing and saying? 3. 🔥 Fire — Feeling & Beaming → What are you feeling and beaming (expressive emption)? 4. 💧 Water — Thinking & Dreaming → What are you thinking and dreaming (expressive thought)? ❌ What Doesn’t Work • Economics? Bots = better at games than we are. Raised costs just raise stakes • Algorithms? Algorithms favor engagement, not humanity. TikTok proves we favor algo-boosted strangers. Engaging bots beat boring humans. • Biometrics? That’s just a timestamp. In vulnerable communities, verified identities will be sold. Now you’ve got a verified bot with a real person’s face—a bigger problem? not a solution, and the birth of new identity trading market
4 replies
1 recast
8 reactions
mark mollé
@marmo.eth
@web3pm what do you think about my identity solution?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
mark mollé
@marmo.eth
also additional benefit to walk and talks @walkntalk put someone behind a keyboard and cruelty comes easy. Put a lens in front of their face and something changes. Researchers observed behavior in an office kitchen where people were asked to pay for tea and coffee via an “honesty box” (i.e., a tip jar). Above the box, they alternated weekly between two types of images: • A neutral image (like flowers) • A pair of watching eyes 📊 The Result When eyes were displayed: • People paid significantly more for their drinks—nearly three times more than during flower weeks. • No one was actually watching; the mere presence of images of eyes influenced behavior. the same works for your own selfie eyes
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Stephan
@stephancill
something that farcaster has taught me is that there is a second axis to the spam problem. it's not really adequate to ask if an account is controlled by a bot or a human, because bots can post interesting things and humans can post spam. the second axis is authenticity – "does this content accurately reflect who you say you are / your intent?" when it comes to content feeds, only authenticity matters. when it comes to connecting with people, personhood *and* authenticity matter
2 replies
1 recast
1 reaction
Jabo5779
@jabo5779
Brute force approach. Assume all are bots. Love them all equally. The bots are either human and present themselves. Or The bots become human, and I survive the robot apocalypse because of the relationships I built with all the bots here. Either way... Love wins in the end. ❤️ Keep talking mark They will come.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
