Manan
@manan
wondering why this cast did so badly. only 100+ views. anyone have feedback?
10 replies
0 recast
17 reactions
Manan
@manan
the bots didn't like the simulation either lol
0 reply
0 recast
8 reactions
rish
@rish
was too galaxy brain
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Linda Xie
@linda
"deterministic inputs & outputs, shape rotators, LLMs, probabilistic outcomes, wordcels" combined in the first sentence when I'm scrolling the feed for fun :P
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
3% engagement rate isn't actually that bad. shape rotators / wordcel is kind of like rationalist twitter language or AI discourse, doesn't appeal to that many people here. then you jump into a 2 brain metaphor and I don't really get it. was short enough that I thought it would be a quick read, but I couldn't read it quickly and go aha
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
meta-david π₯| Building Scoop3
@metadavid
talk like a human
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
πΆππππΏβ¨
@toyboy.eth
Itβs just what it is these days, algo is difficult or maybe pushed more towards new users for now. And 100 views mean nothing on farcaster for the most part.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Jason
@jachian
Clugy headline. You lost me at shape rotators and a less technical audience well before that
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
priyankaπ¦
@priyanka
too big brain (for ppl like me)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Charlie
@ocmo
and im out here grinding for 0 zero views smh
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
SongsOfEden
@songsofeden
Hereβs some engagement
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
