✦ mahi ✦
@mahitripathi
/hottakes AI art is NOT art and you are definitely NOT an artist or creator if thats the only way you “make art” because YOU are not creating anything. you are asking code to create a mod podge of stolen art from REAL artists AI algorithms dont know what it is to make art, it is just taught what to steal and immitate when someone prompts it with something that matches an image in its database it is stolen and soulless if you disagree, feel free to argue with your momma - an artist
10 replies
2 recasts
21 reactions
Konohime
@konohime.eth
It's stolen only if it's owned 👀 Digital scarcity (aka nft, or blockchain timespamping) is still so underestimated. Gen AI should be timestamped all the time, and pay royalties everytime an original artwork has been used to create air content
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
✦ mahi ✦
@mahitripathi
This is a great thought, but the reality of things don’t work this way. The whole studio ghibli trend is a great example. And speaking outside of technicality, even if royalties are given, an AI algorithm can only make something by taking from others, it’s not capable of making something itself.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Konohime
@konohime.eth
Well, just like 99% of artists somehow, we all get inspiration from things that surround us ^^ I don't believe in talent except for Michel Ange and few others I think we must fight fire with fire on this one, owning the content and making it Creative commons (choose your license here) would benefit long term for everybody. If an IA pick your content to sell something, you should get paid without third party
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction