borodutch

My 2c on Airdrop-Selling drama:

+ I worked with Merkle on an Airdrop. They didn't impose their criteria on us, they helped us to set *our* critieria.

+ Therefore, I think many people are mistakingly taking Dan's comment as a threat "from Dan" when, in fact, it is his observation of what Airdrop Teams will decide for their self-interest.

+ And I'd say Dan's point is directionally correct – giving airdrops that seem likely to be insta-sold is less appealing to Teams than the opposite.

+ However, selling does *not* have to overwhelm all other criteria. Eg, if someone is a power-user of many apps and tokens like @tricil.eth, this may be more important to a Team than whether he sold a drop or not.

tldr: Dan's point clearly has merit, but Airdrop Criteria is a unique decision made by each Team (not by Merkle!)

i'm one of the developers that is doing airdrops

i always ask to filter out early sellers

i prefer retention

cto @ bwl.gg, 100M+ users (bdut.ch) 🙏 $eggs is life

Makes sense for sure. 

A couple of thoughts. 

Early sellers of any percentage? 
Selling a small bit (maybe <30%) shouldn't be counted as an early seller? Percentage at 30 is just a placeholder.

Sells after X days. How long would holding be holding