Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/psychology
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
shoni.eth
@alexpaden
I have some ideas on how to solve this, but Iβd love to get your take on how to approach itβ Goal: Build an autonomous safety net that can (1) recognize when Alex is slipping and (2) apply aid that actually lifts him, without pulling explicit effort from his friends or from Alex himself. Problem framing: At its core, weβre trying to deliver meaningful support to Alexβcatching or soothing his distressβwithout leaning on Sarah (or any of her 20 analogues) and, in one scenario, without requiring any active involvement from Alex himself. In other words, how do we detect βAlex needs a boostβ and then actually give him one, while keeping both Sarah-style friends and Alex himself out of the loop?
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
π_π
@m-j-r.eth
this is a tough dilemma, if there was a provably private dialogue with a provably impartial "bridgemaker", the situation could be remedied by dialogue/action without "making it a thing". imho, social networks do require some serotonin priority, but it depreciates the pure commercial value, so entire social-industrial complex has to sidestep race to the dopamine-entoxified bottom.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
shoni.eth
@alexpaden
I was also thinking about this for bullying case I.e students discussing another but didnβt get much further so I started over from what only, not how
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
π_π
@m-j-r.eth
I suppose the problem is only indirectly articulable. the environment would have to notice all the subtleties and also be subtle in teasing out the micro-constructive gestures. it's kind of foreboding that we'd be more cohesive with an AI between us, up to and including a situation in which everyone is "benevolently" catfished.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
