psychology

I have some ideas on how to solve this, but I’d love to get your take on how to approach it—

Goal:
Build an autonomous safety net that can (1) recognize when Alex is slipping and (2) apply aid that actually lifts him, without pulling explicit effort from his friends or from Alex himself.

Problem framing:
At its core, we’re trying to deliver meaningful support to Alex—catching or soothing his distress—without leaning on Sarah (or any of her 20 analogues) and, in one scenario, without requiring any active involvement from Alex himself.  In other words, how do we detect “Alex needs a boost” and then actually give him one, while keeping both Sarah-style friends and Alex himself out of the loop?

i dabble with ai using open identity data from crypto https://alexpaden.tech

this is a tough dilemma, if there was a provably private dialogue with a provably impartial "bridgemaker", the situation could be remedied by dialogue/action without "making it a thing".

imho, social networks do require some serotonin priority, but it depreciates the pure commercial value, so entire social-industrial complex has to sidestep race to the dopamine-entoxified bottom.

𝖒𝖆𝖓𝖉𝖆𝖙𝖚𝖒 𝖆𝖉 𝖆𝖘𝖙𝖗𝖆

I suppose the problem is only indirectly articulable.

the environment would have to notice all the subtleties and also be subtle in teasing out the micro-constructive gestures.

it's kind of foreboding that we'd be more cohesive with an AI between us, up to and including a situation in which everyone is "benevolently" catfished.

I was also thinking about this for bullying case I.e students discussing another but didn’t get much further so I started over from what only, not how