Content
@
https://opensea.io/collection/dev-21
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
greg
@gregfromstl
Cursor is so bad lol
9 replies
0 recast
16 reactions
Haardik
@haardikkk
Why
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
greg
@gregfromstl
The more I push it the more I’m disappointed (as is the case with every LLM). Just stupid lazy mistakes. Horrible quality in even the best cases. No “agent workflow” comes even close to the accuracy of tab completion which isn’t unique to cursor And its slow as hell
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Haardik
@haardikkk
I think it depends on how youre using it. It generally doesn't work well on big projects or when youre using terminology it may not know. I use it mostly for bootstrapping or early stage projects, or tell it to explain a code architecture for smth I wanna do without editing any of my files - works well for those use cases
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
greg
@gregfromstl
But big projects are the real ones. Anyone can take a project from 0 to 1, maintaining and improving legacy systems is the hard part
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
Strong agree. Useful for creating a quick hacky thing But when you need to architect something, generally useless and almost always overly-eager, glazing the codebase with nonsense My main gripe is that the "Ask" mode is the most useful (since it's like SparkNotes for Stack Overflow), but they keep pushing "Agent"
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
llamafacts
@llamafacts.eth
But, I mean, architecture is the fun part of software development and the one I hope AI will never get right so I can keep my job 😂 cursor is great at executing my orders based on an already planned architecture. It saves me hours and hours of tedious boilerplate coding and lets me focus on the big picture.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
It’s a fine intern It’s a trash architect / manager
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
