drewcoffman
@drewcoffman.eth
spending a rainy saturday drinking coffee and thinking about how to fix DAOs
14 replies
0 recast
42 reactions
phil
@phil
need to fix the incentives. it starts with allowing there to be ownership and a reputable process for arbitration
3 replies
0 recast
8 reactions
links đ´
@links
I kind of feel like as soon as you need arbitration youâve done something wrong
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
phil
@phil
? disputes are one of the first things that happen when there is any amount of success in a shared venture you obviously need to be optimistic and plan for the best, but i donât know a single example of a highly successful company that hasnât had some kind of major lawsuit even in the best of cases, this process is incredibly messy. especially if the dao doesnât have a physical jurisdiction
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
links đ´
@links
Thinking of a DAO as a company is where we differ. I think we still donât know what DAOs really are/what they are good for. Thinking of them as private enterprises gives them a bunch of pre-set baggage im not sure I buy into. If you think of a DAO as a self-governing entity, then a well-functioning DAO wouldnât need arbitration, because its mechanisms would be set up to self-regulate. Put another way: arbitration is a feature for individuals, but DAOs are symbiotic collectives. Of course I donât have a great example of thisâŚnor am I sure that a DAO is a self-governing entity. Just trying to explain my POV which I will admit is non-standard.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
phil
@phil
i think itâs overly optimistic and naive tbh i understand what youâre saying, but youâre just describing a different type of arbitration a la forks people will disagree any time there is value involved, even if itâs internet money
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction