errorgardener
@errorgardener
Perhaps /fwb should have just tried “adding culture to their tech stack” instead of destroying their reputation through an “arcade” token or whatever the fuck that means.
1 reply
0 recast
11 reactions
Benjamin ⌐◨-◨
@latsko.eth
What happened
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
errorgardener
@errorgardener
I guess $benefits migration went live, but fwb announced there is no LP and are reinforcing language on whatever an “arcade” token is as a means to defer criticism from everyone that bought into pre-sale (a year ago) and their justified anger. I just don’t understand why anyone would migrate their $fwb off mainnet into base if an LP wasn’t the expectation. Why bridge to an L2 with “lightning fast transactions” if one wasn’t trying to tap into the trading volume of a cheaper tx layer? Why try and correct for the demise in value of their main membership token instead of trying to build up from it? Additionally, they used Party DAO to raise funds, but doing so at the time in the way that they did only goes to serve the user argument of members that bought in…as the presale concept was the whole reason for using the Party DAO platform around that time…
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions