Product

As a user, I don’t want a wallet from your app.

I want to use your app with my wallet.

Farcaster

clicking @clickerxyz (a @daylight ░░░░░░) | kylemccollom.com

Head of Product at @syky /digital-fashion. Love all dogs and especially my own. ex-Ledger

I like Warpcast’s approach - there’s a signer, but it’s not yet a wallet. 

For all (non-warp) transactions, you transact with your regular wallet.

I’m sure they’ll turn Warpcast into a wallet, but there’s still a ton of ground to take on social, and the team is rightfully focused there.

Just chiming in to say I much prefer Warpcast approach to pretty much anything else I’ve done (even privy)

you probably don’t think about liquidity enough // it is what it is  // build value, not valuation

| 🎩  |  ↑  |  ⌐◨-◨

I think you guys have abstracted things pretty far away for the user which I think is ideal. It might just be dev experience to make things better for users?

Warpcast always felt like account registration was invisible and I was attaching “connected addresses” at will. 

Privy (in my past PWA experience) was making wallets with emails. I just didn’t like it.

What about the Warpcast account/wallet experience would you like to see us incorporate into Privy?