seeing a lot of lazy dunks on the Thiel NYT interview 


if anyone has seriously engaged with his latest stuff would love to hear some serious and rigorous pushbacks

if you haven’t seriously engaged then pls don’t pile




p.s. the Hoover inst. two parts ones are much better than the NYT one for the same material

https://youtu.be/qqHueZNEzig?si=T4O3PFwsAaFH964w

https://youtu.be/wTNI_lCvWZQ?si=7jhRPmxftO5HrtZp

friendly neighborhood shitcaster // working on @pinetree

I’m only a few minutes in - but I like Thiel in this interview. Am I dumb?

you probably don’t think about liquidity enough // it is what it is  // build value, not valuation

the interview is bad 
the question is cornering him 
the cut is borderline malicious 

his latest take on apocalypse vs antichrist is actually really thought provoking 
the hoover inst uncommon knowledge pod is much better

I think the interviewer is mediocre/subpar bc of the antagonizing attitude  - he doesn’t even press on the more fascinating points Thiel is making

Thiel made great talking points though 

Agree - the grade is malicious; still think it’s good work product 

I’ll check the UCK thing