Social networks serving the dual purpose of (i) broadcasting genuinely valuable alpha / analysis / insight / intel / predictions (better and faster than any traditional media can), and (ii) allowing the unfiltered belching of mid opinions (of which everybody has one, like a certain anatomical feature) is the medium's fundamental conundrum. Both are given equal representation by default

That's why, for actual discussions that extend beneath surface takes, I favor Reddit where at least the community does the legwork of assigning positive or negative karma, which generally bubbles up the best takes (if you sort your feed accordingly)

And karma compounds over time at the account level

quote casting so this doesn't get buried in replies

quote casting so this doesn't get buried in replies https://farcaster.xyz/aviationdoctor.eth/0xd4144c8f

I like running, poker and oysters | Founder, Social Forensics | Berkeley & UPenn | Learning to listen