Sinaver Idrisov
@sinaver.eth
Mixed take on this. I don't think it says about their seriousness, Farcaster doesn't have enough distribution. Yet. Unless you're in trenches and experimenting - yes, see @jc4p, or building something completely new experience that farcaster makes it really better, e.g. @bankr @clanker @noiceapp, and you can monetize on. E.g. I have friends with e-commerce experience, and at some point I believe it will be a banger on Farcaster, but what they say it's strategic for them not to disperse their focus yet on things which don't have medium term ROI.
4 replies
1 recast
12 reactions
Kyle Patrick
@kylepatrick.eth
I should've made it clearer, was thinking of crypto-related projects here, but definitely agree on your point. I don't think people should dive on Farcaster head on, but having a plan/strategy should be something they should be thinking about. Not quite there yet for non-crypto native companies, but for crypto, this is one of the best places to get distribution and build.
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
Colin Charles
@bytebot
We should focus on getting distribution here, which then ensures the strategy / app developers make it out well, with a good flywheel. We can btw take the getting distribution into our own hands beyond crypto people fwiw.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Sinaver Idrisov
@sinaver.eth
yah, with crypto native it's more strategic to build on top of farcaster, and now it's much easier with quite polished mini-app integration. but I think it's still more of status/circle, crypto cabal thing, e.g. polymarket probably earns 0 being on farcaster and some products will lose their distribution, e.g. interface, because they would have to compete with other mini-apps, rather then creating their own distribution
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction