Hate to yuck a lot of the yum going on right now, but I don’t like content coins because they encourage rugging the creator.

Example: someone buys a post of a creator for $5. Later it sells for $100. They make a 20x. The creator gets hardly anything.

That dynamic treats creators like inventory, not people worth supporting.

Promote holding. Reward buyers with rev share. Align incentives around supporting creators, not flipping their work.

Would love to better understand or be proven otherwise.

@quicknode GTM | building /startupradar 📡                                 rants and travel photos are my own

It’d be cool if flipping a cast automatically triggered a microtip to the creator. Even something like 1–2% could go a long way

My casts are immutable, but my opinions might get a soft fork… followed by @woj.eth 🎖️

you mean like buying then selling it? that already basically happens bc there's a 1% fee on each trade that goes to the creator.

Not talking about txn fees. I get those and they’re fine. I’m pointing to the PVP dynamic baked into this.

That might be solved by incentivizing audiences to HODL, maybe through something more like staking.

I haven’t given it much thought, but a model where value grows as more people buy, and buyers earn rev share, feels way better than getting rugged by some opportunist.

Now I get you! And your thoughts are valid