Hate to yuck a lot of the yum going on right now, but I don’t like content coins because they encourage rugging the creator.

Example: someone buys a post of a creator for $5. Later it sells for $100. They make a 20x. The creator gets hardly anything.

That dynamic treats creators like inventory, not people worth supporting.

Promote holding. Reward buyers with rev share. Align incentives around supporting creators, not flipping their work.

Would love to better understand or be proven otherwise.

@quicknode GTM | building /startupradar 📡                                 rants and travel photos are my own

It’d be cool if flipping a cast automatically triggered a microtip to the creator. Even something like 1–2% could go a long way

My casts are immutable, but my opinions might get a soft fork… followed by @woj.eth 🎖️

But I think @jesse.base.eth explained this in a comment, let me look for it

I’m trying to get it tbh, because this is a very serious discuss that I’m interested in

They provide txn fees to the creator, my man, but that is not answering my question.

yes there's still iteration to do on the market structure. that said, I generally think traders should be rewarded for the service they provide of price discovery. delicate balance to make all the mechanics works for creators, collectors, and traders.

Exactly, that’s right, but what Jeff is saying now is, what if someone buys my stuff for $5 and they sell for $200 for example… all I get is just 1% of $200 which still feels off I guess

you mean like buying then selling it? that already basically happens bc there's a 1% fee on each trade that goes to the creator.