seeing a lot of lazy dunks on the Thiel NYT interview 


if anyone has seriously engaged with his latest stuff would love to hear some serious and rigorous pushbacks

if you haven’t seriously engaged then pls don’t pile




p.s. the Hoover inst. two parts ones are much better than the NYT one for the same material

seeing a lot of lazy dunks on the Thiel NYT interview 


if anyone has seriously engaged with his latest stuff would love to hear some serious and rigorous pushbacks

if you haven’t seriously engaged then pls don’t pile




p.s. the Hoover inst. two parts ones are much better than the NYT one for the same material

https://youtu.be/qqHueZNEzig?si=T4O3PFwsAaFH964w

https://youtu.be/wTNI_lCvWZQ?si=7jhRPmxftO5HrtZp

Bad cuts and poorly formed dunks, on top of people who suddenly found they had an understanding of Christianity (and yet aren't religious) that argues against his views, despite the literal text of Genesis 1:26-30 completely agreeing with his POV succinctly.

BDFL of Quilibrium, Eng @ Farcaster, ex-Coinbase, always opinionated, never hydrated

/quilibrium

yup yup 

I'm trying to steelman the other side. am incapable myself and can't find any good ones either. 🤷‍♂️

I could steelman it, but I don't disagree with him. When it comes to the alignment compass (left image), my stance is, well... (right image)

you don't disagree but seems like your stance on the compass is different?