Chu Ka-Cheong pfp
Chu Ka-Cheong
@kc
A quick technical review 🧵 on AT Protocol (Bluesky) and Farcaster. Both protocols have quite similar objectives, but they have very different design. First, identity. Both want account portability where user can migrate identity to a new service provider without existing server’s cooperation (unlike Fediverse).
22 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Chu Ka-Cheong pfp
Chu Ka-Cheong
@kc
Account portability is achieved by having handles that resolve into pubkeys that sign messages. Thus data can be authenticated regardless of the location. Both have 2 identifiers: a stable identifier that is not very readable (FID in FC and DID in ATP) and a readable and changeable handle (FNAME and DNS name). 2/n
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction