Chu Ka-Cheong pfp
Chu Ka-Cheong
@kc
A quick technical review 🧵 on AT Protocol (Bluesky) and Farcaster. Both protocols have quite similar objectives, but they have very different design. First, identity. Both want account portability where user can migrate identity to a new service provider without existing server’s cooperation (unlike Fediverse).
22 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Chu Ka-Cheong pfp
Chu Ka-Cheong
@kc
In ATP, the small-world (i.e. PDS) is user-owned and hence it offers censorship resilience similar to the web. The big-world is provided by larger service providers and it is inevitable that censorship (or moderation) happens in this layer. 12/n
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction