Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/kaloh
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kaloh | Indexy.xyz 📊
@kaloh
My two cents on the Zora x Base coins and future of “content coins” “content coins” need to optimise for content not for the coin part to thrive The experience needs to be x10 better than what it is today 1. consuming that content: making it easy for users to understand what’s the content (podcast, article, meme, animation, ad, poster, w/e) 2. distributing that content: meet the users where they are, dexscreener is not it 3. amazing content: probably the hardest. Content that people love
3 replies
2 recasts
15 reactions
Duxander.base.eth |🟦
@altagers.eth
Didn't really understand what was going on, but overall it looks like insider trading + gambling and a lot of people losing money once again but somehow surprised by it
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Kaloh | Indexy.xyz 📊
@kaloh
Why makes you think so? I think this time is more about the concept of content coins, creating content and tokenising it. And a big support form base The chart is irrelevant
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Duxander.base.eth |🟦
@altagers.eth
Overall, tokenisation is a great idea, but there isn't enough liquidity for everyone, but the base must be everyone. I have tried to buy only what I like, what I believe in, but it often fails and I wonder if everything should be tokenised.😀 I'm making a mini app right now and I'm wondering if I should integrate blockchain at all. 1. it's complicated 2. I'm doing this for people, just to share the show and if they want to help, just donate. A lot of people in the crypto market are just in it for money, I would say 90% and just looking for exit liqudity in each other dunno a lot of thoughts :d
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kaloh | Indexy.xyz 📊
@kaloh
My question was more on, what makes you think there was insider trading and manipulation on that base token?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Duxander.base.eth |🟦
@altagers.eth
a few big buys before it was shared on Twitter. If I understand correctly at the very beginning someone bought up almost half of the total supply, and the price went down when the first wallet on the list sold ouтt 28,125,832 -- 41k $ at one transaction and more before it https://dexscreener.com/base/0x06d7874037e622d6ef42294cf32eb259806cb1c6?maker=0x099246cA997ACF47ada682c9c60F9ed0954Ad960
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kaloh | Indexy.xyz 📊
@kaloh
That could be a sniper that was monitoring the base wallet, but saying that’s insider info or market manipulation is a long stretch
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
