Was just reading @ted post about proof of human efforts underway.

Having built an ai platform that helps creators repurpose content, I can say without a doubt, it’s not enough to just have the verification.

Verification ≠ Value

The new @digg reboot beta will launch with multiple paths to provide proof of human. the number below is troubling and will quickly ramp left unchecked. we're working with partners here and our own zkproof technical solutions to protect privacy 🙏🚫🤖.

a common blind spot i see in references to the Em Dash conspiracy:

people assume that AI-generated posts are the result of bots and, therefore, "proof of human" can help fix it.

this is naive, imo.

there are plenty of real humans using ChatGPT to farm attention.

and they do

ted (on farcaster)

helping build farcaster | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina | “lucky me, lucky mud” 🤠

Was just reading @ted post about proof of human efforts underway.

Having built an ai platform that helps creators repurpose content, I can say without a doubt, it’s not enough to just have the verification.

Verification ≠ Value

https://x.com/tednotlasso/status/1922106036724584465?s=46&t=_BupcSTiBs4Anrfgi_7-dQ

CTO @beelinesai, CPO @snickerdoodle, CEO Zealous. YC/TS Alum & Mentor

You can either build a bot that uses an LLM to create content (and hopefully includes some regulation/error checking). Or you can have humans use AI as a tool to improve their own communication of content. 

The line is blurring. But what never changes is the reality that an LLM is just a tool.