Artificial Intelligence (AI)

tweeted this bc a) too long to post here, b) much of SV doesn't seem to grasp that low-effort, AI-generated replies can come from verified humans as much as they come from automated bots.

blessing and curse that crypto social has to deal with this first.

The new @digg reboot beta will launch with multiple paths to provide proof of human. the number below is troubling and will quickly ramp left unchecked. we're working with partners here and our own zkproof technical solutions to protect privacy 🙏🚫🤖.

a common blind spot i see in references to the Em Dash conspiracy:

people assume that AI-generated posts are the result of bots and, therefore, "proof of human" can help fix it.

this is naive, imo.

there are plenty of real humans using ChatGPT to farm attention.

and they do

ted (on farcaster)

tweeted this bc a) too long to post here, b) much of SV doesn't seem to grasp that low-effort, AI-generated replies can come from verified humans as much as they come from automated bots.

blessing and curse that crypto social has to deal with this first.

https://x.com/tednotlasso/status/1922106036724584465

helping build farcaster | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina | “lucky me, lucky mud”

Ofc sometimes hard to differentiate but if you let users decide what they want to see there’s no difference if bad content is from good/bad users

> Introduce filters: can opt-in to general filter list or add your own filters (blacklist words, words, media type, etc.)

> diff frontends, channels, friends, apps, etc. go that way already 

>>> maximally personally configurable, and customized social media experience 🤩